##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

A study was conducted to assess the effect of feed form and microbial enzyme supplementation on performance, endogenous enzyme activities and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens fed Tanzania-type diets. A total of 480 day-old Ross 308 broiler chickens were allocated to a 2 (mash or pellet) × 4 (no enzyme, Axtra XB, Quantum Blue or Axtra XB + Quantum Blue) factorial arrangement, in a completely randomized design with 10 birds per replicate. Feed intake (FI), body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were determined at 10, 24 and 35 days of age. Visceral organ weight was measured at 10 d and 24 d, and meat parts yield was assessed at 35 d. Feed intake (FI) was highest in birds fed the pelleted diets at 24 d and 35 d, and it was increased further when enzymes were supplemented individually and in combination. Body weight gain was comparatively higher in the birds fed pelleted diets. Enzyme supplementation was found to increase BWG at 24 d and 35 d. The FCR was reduced in birds fed the pelleted diets compared to the mash-fed birds. Birds provided with a combination of Axtra XB and QB responded with lower FCR. The relative weight of gizzard plus proventriculus, pancreas and small intestine were higher in birds fed on mash; however, the effect of enzymes was only observed on the pancreas at 10 d. The relative weights of most body parts (breast, thighs and drumsticks) were significantly higher in birds fed pelleted diets with inclusion of microbial enzymes. The dry matter (DM) digestibility was neither affected by feed form nor by enzyme supplementation while the digestibility of gross energy (GE), starch, protein, and fat were higher in birds fed pelleted diets than those on mash. Addition of microbial enzymes positively influenced the digestibility of all nutrients that were assessed. Endogenous enzyme activities at 10 d were higher in birds supplied with pelleted diets, except for sucrase, which was not affected by feed form. Exogenous enzyme inclusion in diets only affected the activities of sucrase and aminopeptidase at 24 d. The results indicated that both pelleting of diets and microbial enzyme supplementation increased FI and BWG and improved FCR in broiler chickens. The activities of pancreatic and most of the jejunal enzymes were increased by feeding of pelleted feeds, resulting in better nutrient digestibility.

References

  1. Ravindran V. Poultry feed availability and nutrition in developing countries. Poultry development review. FAO, 2013b;60-63.
     Google Scholar
  2. Brickett KE, Dahiya JP, Classen HL & Gomis S. Influence of Dietary Nutrient Density, Feed Form, and Lighting on Growth and Meat Yield of Broiler Chickens. Poultry Science, 2007;86:2172-2181.
     Google Scholar
  3. Abdollahi MR, Ravindran V, Svihus B. Pelleting of broiler diets: An overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2013;179:1-23.
     Google Scholar
  4. Chehraghi M, Zakeri A, Taghinejad-Roudbaneh M. Effects of different feed forms on performance in broiler chickens. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2013;3:66-70.
     Google Scholar
  5. Omede AA, Iji PA. Response of broiler chickens to processed soy protein product when offered at different inclusion levels in mash or crumbled prestarter diets. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2018;27:159-171.
     Google Scholar
  6. Serrano MP, Valencia DG, Méndez J, Mateos, GG. Influence of feed form and source of soybean meal of the diet on growth performance of broilers from 1 to 42 days of age. 1. Floor pen study. Poultry Science, 2012; 91:2838-2844.
     Google Scholar
  7. Glover B, Foltz K, Holásková I, Moritz J. Effects of modest improvements in pellet quality and experiment pen size on broiler chicken performance. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2015;25:21-28.
     Google Scholar
  8. Amerah A, Ravindran V, Lentle R, Thomas D. Influence of Feed Particle Size on the Performance, Energy Utilization, Digestive Tract Development, and Digesta Parameters of Broiler Starters Fed Wheat- and Corn-Based Diets. Poultry Science, 2008;87:2320-2328.
     Google Scholar
  9. Massuquetto A, Durau JF, Schramm VG, Netto MVT, Krabbe EL, Maiorka A. Influence of feed form and conditioning time on pellet quality, performance and ileal nutrient digestibility in broilers. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2018;27:51-58.
     Google Scholar
  10. Ghobadi Z, Karimi A. Effect of feed processing and enzyme supplementation of wheat-based diets on performance of broiler chicks. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2012;40:260-266.
     Google Scholar
  11. Amerah A, Ravindran V, Lentle R, Thomas D. Influence of feed particle size and feed form on the performance, energy utilization, digestive tract development, and digesta parameters of broiler tarters. Poultry Science, 2007b; 86:2615-2623.
     Google Scholar
  12. Ravindran V. Feed enzymes: The science, practice, and metabolic realities 1. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2013;22, 628-636.
     Google Scholar
  13. Sarvestani TS, Dabiri N, Agah M, Norollahi H. Effect of pellet and mash diets associated with biozyme enzyme on broilers performance. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2006;5:485-490.
     Google Scholar
  14. De Sousa J, Albino L, Vaz R, Rodrigues K, Da Silva G, Renno L, Barros V, Kaneko I. The effect of dietary phytase on broiler performance and digestive, bone, and blood biochemistry characteristics. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola, 2015;17:69-76.
     Google Scholar
  15. Amerah A, Gilbert C, Simmins P, Ravindran V. Influence of feed processing on the efficacy of exogenous enzymes in broiler diets. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 2011;67:29-46.
     Google Scholar
  16. Aviagen Inc. Ross x ross 308 North American broiler performance objectives.Huntsville, AL Aviagen Inc, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  17. NHMRC. New edition of the Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes. Universities Australia and CSIRO, Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council. 2013;90.
     Google Scholar
  18. Short F, Gorton P, Wiseman J, Boorman K. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1996;59:215-221.
     Google Scholar
  19. Sweeney RA. Generic combustion method for determination of crude protein in feeds: Collaborative study. Journal-Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, 1989;72:770-774.
     Google Scholar
  20. McCleary BV, Solah V, Gibson TS. Quantitative Measurement of Total Starch in Cereal Flours and Products. Journal of Cereal Science,1994;20:51-58.
     Google Scholar
  21. Moughan PJ, Marlies Leenaars. Endogenous amino acid flow in the stomach and small intestine of the young growing pig. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1992;60,437-442.
     Google Scholar
  22. Kong C, Adeola O. Evaluation of amino Acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for Swine and poultry diets. Asian-australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014;27:917-925.
     Google Scholar
  23. Shirazi-Beechey SP, Smith MW, Wang Y, James PS. Postnatal development of lamb intestinal digestive enzymes is not regulated by diet. The Journal of Physiology,199;437:691-698.
     Google Scholar
  24. Iji P, Saki A, Tivey D. Body and intestinal growth of broiler chicks on a commercial starter diet. 1. Intestinal weight and mucosal development. British Poultry Science, 2001;42:505-513.
     Google Scholar
  25. Susbilla J, Tarvid I, Gow C, Frankel T. Quantitative feed restriction or meal-feeding of broiler chicks alter functional development of enzymes for protein digestion. British Poultry Science, 2003;44:698-709.
     Google Scholar
  26. Nitsan Z, Dror Y, Nir I, Shapira. The effects of force-feeding on enzymes of the liver, kidney, pancreas and digestive tract of chicks. British Journal of Nutrition, 1974:241-247.
     Google Scholar
  27. Forstner G, Sabesin S, Isselbacher K. Rat intestinal microvillus membranes. Purification and biochemical characterization. Biochemical Journal, 1968;106:381-390.
     Google Scholar
  28. Holdsworth E. The effect of vitamin D on enzyme activities in the mucosal cells of the chick small intestine. The Journal of Membrane Biology, 1970;3:43-53.
     Google Scholar
  29. Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 1976;72:248-254.
     Google Scholar
  30. Minitab. MINITAB release 17: Statistical software for windows. State College, PA: Minitab, Inc, 2014. (http://www.minitab.com).
     Google Scholar
  31. Truong, HH, Neilson KA, McInerney BV, Khoddami A, Roberts TH, Liu SY, Selle PH. Performance of broiler chickens offered nutritionally-equivalent diets based on two red grain sorghums with quantified kafirin concentrations as intact pellets or re-ground mash following steam-pelleting at 65 or 97 C conditioning temperatures. Animal Nutrition; 2015;1, 220-228.
     Google Scholar
  32. Lv M, Yan L, Wang Z, An S, Wu M, Lv Z. Effects of feed form and feed particle size on growth performance, carcass characteristics and digestive tract development of broilers. Animal Nutrition, 2015;1, 252-256.
     Google Scholar
  33. Mabelebele M, Gous R, O'Neil HM, Iji P. Whole sorghum inclusion and feed form on performance and nutrient digestibility of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition 2018;6,e5.
     Google Scholar
  34. Amerah A, Ravindran V, Lentle R, Thomas D. Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 2007a;63:439-455.
     Google Scholar
  35. Attia YA, El-Tahawy, WS, El-Hamid A, Nizza A, Al-Harthi MA, El-Kelway MI, Bovera F. Effect of feed form, pellet diameter and enzymes supplementation on carcass characteristics, meat quality, blood plasma constituents and stress indicators of broilers. Archives Animal Breeding, 2014a;57:1-14.
     Google Scholar
  36. Amerah A, van de Belt K, van Der Klis J. Effect of different levels of rapeseed meal and sunflower meal and enzyme combination on the performance, digesta viscosity and carcass traits of broiler chickens fed wheat-based diets. Animals, 2015;9, 1131-1137.
     Google Scholar
  37. Erdaw MM, Perez-Maldonado RA, Bhuiyan M, Iji PA. Partial replacement of commercial soybean meal with raw, full-fat soybean meal supplemented with varying levels of protease in diets of broiler chickens. South African Journal of Animal Sciences, 2017;47:61-71.
     Google Scholar
  38. Attia YA. El-Tahawy, WS, El-Hamid A, Nizza A, Bovera F, Al-Harthi MA, El-Kelway MI. Effect of feed form, pellet diameter and enzymes supplementation on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of broiler during days 21-37 of age. Archives Animal Breeding, 2014b;57:1-11.
     Google Scholar
  39. Cowieson A, Hruby M, Pierson EM. Evolving enzyme technology: impact on commercial poultry nutrition. Nutrition Research Review, 2006;19,: 90-103.
     Google Scholar
  40. Svihus B. The gizzard: function, influence of diet structure and effects on nutrient availability. World's Poultry Science Journal, 2011;67:207-224.
     Google Scholar
  41. Svihus B. Gastrointestinal tract development: implications for free-range and conventional production. In the Proceeding 23rd Annual Australian Poultry Science Symp. 19-22 Feb 2012, in Sydney, pp 19-22.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)