Research Article

Farmers’ Awareness of and Attitude towards Diversified Legumes Production in Singida Region, Tanzania

Caroline Fredy Lema
Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
* Corresponding author
Michael Kadigi
Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
Kim Abel Kayunze
Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
DOI icon 10.24018/ejfood.2024.6.1.710

Read Counter
593

Downloads
443

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2023-06-29
Published 2024-01-18

Read counter = 593 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

For an extended period, legumes have served as nutritional sources in the diets of both humans and animals. Efforts have been made to increase the yield of the legume crops in Tanzania, but there is still low awareness of and unfavourable attitudes towards legume crop diversification among farmers. The study, on which this paper is based, aimed at investigating farmers’ awareness of and attitude towards diversified legumes, specifically to analyze socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents, assess awareness of and attitude towards diversified legumes production, and determine effects of awareness of and attitude towards diversified legumes production on management practices of diversified legumes production. A cross-sectional survey was employed whereby primary data were collected from 204 legume farmers using a semi-structured questionnaire. Content analysis was conducted using Nvivo software to analyze qualitative data. For quantitative data, Likert scale analysis was employed as a method for descriptive statistics, and Principal Component Analysis was used as a method for inferential analysis. These analyses were performed using Smart PLS software. The findings of the study revealed that several factors significantly influenced smallholder farmers' awareness and perception of diversified legumes. These factors included ease of cultivation, fair distribution of seeds, food availability, increase in income level, high legume harvest, and higher profitability of legumes (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the statement "enough of information" did not show statistical significance (p > 0.05). However, it exhibited a positive association. Conclusively, criteria like "easy cultivation" and "fair seed distribution" had a big impact on how smallholder farmers perceived and knew about diverse legumes. However, "enough information" did not appear to have a major significance. In addition, it was found that major influences on farmers' attitudes and understanding of diversified legumes included the availability of food, rising income levels, high yields of legumes, and perceived profitability. The paper recommends for the improvement of farmers' awareness and perception of diversified legumes, fair seed distribution methods must be established that provide equal access to high-quality seeds with the help of government organizations, non-profit organizations, and seed businesses.

Keywords: Analysis of smallholder farmers diversified legumes principal component

References

  1. WFP. WFP in Africa: 2013 Facts, Figures and Partners [Internet] 2013; Available from: athttps://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/communications/wfp282142.pdf
     Google Scholar
  2. Awiti H, Gido E, Obare G. Smallholder farmers climate smart crop diversification cost structure: Empirical evidence from Western Kenya. Journal of Frontier in Sustainable Food Systems. 2022; 6(20):842987.
     Google Scholar
  3. Hassen A, Shigeta M, Hussien J. Assessing smallholder farmers' knowledge and perceptions on diversified legume production systems in Ethiopia. Sustainability. 2020; 12(4):1529.
     Google Scholar
  4. Muoni T, Barnes A, Öborn I, Watson C, Bergkvist G, Shiluli M, et al. Farmer perceptions of legumes and their functions in smallholder farming systems in east Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2019; 17:3:205-218.
     Google Scholar
  5. Katungi E, Farrow A, Chianu J, Sperling L, Beebe S. Common bean in Eastern and Southern Africa: a situation and outlook analysis. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture. 2009; 61:56.
     Google Scholar
  6. Mremi J, Jeckonial J and Nyamhanga P. Gender Dynamics, Dietary Diversity among Small Scale Legume Farmers in Singida District, Tanzania. AJASS. 2023; 6(1):307-321. Available at http://repository.tia.ac.tz/handle/123456789/150
     Google Scholar
  7. Haug R. Farmers' knowledge and perceptions of grain legume cultivation and its potential benefits in Tanzania. Experimental Agriculture. 2018; 54(4):606-622.
     Google Scholar
  8. FAO. Pulse crops for sustainable farms in sub-Saharan Africa. Rome, Italy. 2018; Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/3/I8300EN/i8300en.pdf
     Google Scholar
  9. Udoh S, Nwosu I. Enhancing Farmers' Knowledge and Adoption of Diversified Legumes in Nigeria: An Application of Social Marketing Strategies. Sustainability. 2020; 12(8):3281.
     Google Scholar
  10. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
     Google Scholar
  11. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
     Google Scholar
  12. Mwinzi JM. Theoretical Frameworks and Indigenous Knowledge Systems. International Journal of Education and Research. 2015; 13(2): 677-684
     Google Scholar
  13. Lekule C. Investigating school experiences of vulnerable children in Singida, Tanzania: Challenges, strategies, and possible interventions. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2014; 5079. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5079
     Google Scholar
  14. Jolliffe I, and Cadima J. Principal Component Analysis. A review and recent developments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 2016; A.3742015020220150202http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
     Google Scholar
  15. Mdoe N, Macha J. Gender and Rural Poverty in Tanzania: Case of Selected Villages in Morogoro Rural and Kilosa Districts. LADDER working paper; 2002.
     Google Scholar
  16. William A, Donkoh S, George N. Adoption of Bambara groundnut production and its effects on farmers’ welfare in Northern Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2016; 11(7):583-594.
     Google Scholar
  17. Okello GO. Gender relations in beans crop production and marketing among smallholder farmers in homebay county [Masters thesis]. Nairobi, Kenya: University of Nairobi; 2018.
     Google Scholar
  18. Tegegne Y. Factors affecting adoption of legume technologies and its impact on income of farmers: The case of Sinana and Ginir Woredas of Bale Zone. MSc thesis in Agricultural Economics. Haramaya, Ethiopia: Haramaya University; 2017.
     Google Scholar
  19. Nyasimi M, Kimeli P, Sayula G, Radeny M, Kinyangi J, Mungai C. Adoption and dissemination pathways for climate-smart agriculture technologies and practices for climate-resilient livelihoods in Lushoto, Northeast Tanzania. Climate. 2017; 5(3):63.
     Google Scholar
  20. Lugamara CB. Determinants of Smallholder Farmers’ Adoption and Willingness to Pay for Improved Legume Technologies in Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2021; 20 (2):245-260.
     Google Scholar
  21. Anang B, Bäckman S, Rezitis A. Does farm size matter? Investigating scale efficiency of peasant rice farmers in northern Ghana. Economics Bulletin. 2016;36(4):2275-2290.
     Google Scholar
  22. Makate C, Makate M, Mango N, Siziba S. Increasing resilience of smallholder farmers to climate change through multiple adoption of proven climate-smart agriculture innovations. Lessons from Southern Africa. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019; 231:858-868.
     Google Scholar
  23. Ojiewo C, Omoigui L, Pasupuleti J, Lenné J. Grain legume seed systems for smallholder farmers: Perspectives on successful innovations. Outlook on Agriculture. 2020;49(4):286-292.
     Google Scholar
  24. Mhango W, Snapp S and Phiri G. Opportunities and constraints to legume diversification for sustainable maize production on smallholder farms in Malawi. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2013; 28(3):234-244.
     Google Scholar
  25. Snapp S, Cox C, Peter B. Multipurpose legumes for smallholders in sub-Saharan Africa: Identification of promising ‘scale out’options. Global Food Security. 2019;23:22-32.
     Google Scholar
  26. Ditzler L, van Apeldoorn D, Pellegrini F, Antichi D, Bàrberi P, Rossing W. Current research on the ecosystem service potential of legume inclusive cropping systems in Europe. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2021; 41:1-13.
     Google Scholar
  27. Ruelle M, Asfaw Z, Dejen A, Tewolde-Berhan S, Nebiyu A, Tana T et al. Inter-and intraspecific diversity of food legumes among households and communities in Ethiopia. PloS One. 2019;14(12):e0227074.
     Google Scholar
  28. Vanlauwe B, Hungria M, Kanampiu F, Giller K. The role of legumes in the sustainable intensification of African smallholder agriculture: Lessons learnt and challenges for the future. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment. 2019;284:106583.
     Google Scholar
  29. DeJager I., Abizari A, Douma J, Giller K, Brouwer D. Grain legume cultivation and children’s dietary diversity in smallholder farming households in rural Ghana and Kenya. Food Security. 2017; 9:1053-1071.
     Google Scholar
  30. Ferreira H, Pinto E, Vasconcelos M. Legumes as a cornerstone of the transition toward more sustainable agri-food systems and diets in Europe. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2021; 5:694121.
     Google Scholar