##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The genetic variability for yield, its attributing, and fruit quality traits using 38 tomato genotypes was studied. High significant differences among the genotypes were found for all recorded traits. Phenotypic coefficient of variation was greater than genotypic coefficient of variation for all the traits indicating the presence of environmental influences. Most of the traits expressed moderate to high heritability. Plant height, number of seed/fruit, chlorophyll content in top leaf, red fruit weight, number of fruit/plant, soluble solid content in exocarp and endocarp of red fruit, titratable acidity of red fruit juice, lycopene content, beta-carotene and yield/plant had high heritability along with high genetic advance as percentage of the mean. Yield/plant exhibited a significant positive correlation with number of fruit/plant, number of flower/bunch, red fruit girth, red fruit length and red fruit weight. Path analysis revealed soluble solid content in endocarp of red fruit, number of fruit/plant, plant height, number of bunch/plant, number of flower/bunch, number of seed/fruit, green fruit length, red fruit girth, red fruit length, red fruit weight, lycopene and beta-carotene content had direct positive effect on yield/plant. Principal component analysis depicted first eight PCs with Eigen-value higher than one contributing 76.74% of total variability. Thirty-eight genotypes grouped into seven clusters where cluster II contains maximum genotypes. Based on the mean performance, genotypes Tm-131 and WOP-10 for yield and ascorbic acid content; Puli-25, VI005584 and Tm-2 for total soluble solids; VI-063607 and VI-0337183 for lycopene and beta-carotene content may be considered as superior genotypes which can be used as potential genetic resources for the development of nutritionally rich high-yielding tomato variety.

References

  1. Pérez-Marín J, Issa-Issa H, Clemente-Villalba J, García-Garví JM, Hernández F, Carbonell-Barrachina ÁA, et al. Physicochemical, volatile, and sensory characterization of promising cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars: Fresh Market Aptitudes of Pear and Round Fruits. Agronomy. 2021; 11(4): 618.
     Google Scholar
  2. Ranjan A, Ichihashi Y, Sinha NR. The tomato genome: Implications for plant breeding, genomics and evolution. Genome Biology. 2012; 13(8): 167.
     Google Scholar
  3. Fentik DA. Review on genetics and breeding of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Advances in Crop Science and Technology. 2017; 5(5): 1-6.
     Google Scholar
  4. Quinet M, Angosto T, Yuste-Lisbona FJ, Blancard-Gros R, Bigot S, Martinez Juan-Pablo, et al. Tomato fruit development and metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2019; 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01554.
     Google Scholar
  5. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Crops and livestock products. FAOSTAT [Internet]. 2021; Available from: http://faostat.fao.org.
     Google Scholar
  6. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). Statistical Yearbook Bangladesh 2022. Statistics and Informatics Division (SID), Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2022.
     Google Scholar
  7. Hossain ME, Alam MJ, Hakim MA, Amanullah ASM, Ahsanullah ASM. An assesment of physicochemical properties of some tomato genotypes and varieties grown at Rangpur. Bangladesh Res. Pub. J. 2010; 4(3): 135-243.
     Google Scholar
  8. Hossain M, Abdulla F. On the production behaviors and forecasting the tomatoes production in Bangladesh. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development. 2015; 4: 66-74.
     Google Scholar
  9. Bauchet G, Causse M. Genetic Diversity in Plants; M. Caliskan, London: InTech, 2012, ch. 8. doi: 10.5772/33073.
     Google Scholar
  10. Viskelis P, Radzevicius A, Urbonaviciene D, Viskelis J, Karkleliene R, Bobinas C. Plants for the Future, London: In Tech, 2015, pp. 45-77; 2015. doi: 10.5772/60873.
     Google Scholar
  11. Friedman M. Anticarcinogenic, cardioprotective, and other health benefits of tomato compounds lycopene, α-tomatine, and tomatidine in pure form and in fresh and processed tomatoes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2013; 61(40): 9534-9550.
     Google Scholar
  12. Sepat NK, Sepat SR, Sepat S, Kumar A. Energy use efficiency and cost analysis of tomato under greenhouse and open field production system at Nubra valley of Jammu and Kashmir. International Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2013; 3(4): 1233-1241.
     Google Scholar
  13. Carluccio F, Lenucci M, Piro G, Siems W, Luño J. Vegetable derived antioxidant and Vitamin D: Effects on oxidative stress and bone mineral metabolism of aged patients with renal disease. Functional Foods in Health & Disease. 2016; 6: 379-387.
     Google Scholar
  14. Alda LM, Gogoa I, Bordean D, Gergen I, Alda S, Moldovan C, et al. Lycopene content of tomatoes and tomato products. Journal of Agroalimentary Process and Technologies. 2009; 15(4): 540-542.
     Google Scholar
  15. Chauhan K, Sharma S, Agarwal N, Chauhan B. Lycopene of tomato fame: its roke in health and disease. Int J Pharma Sci Rev Res. 2011; 10(1): 99-115.
     Google Scholar
  16. Holzapfel NP, Holzapfel BM, Champ S, Feldthusen J, Clements J, Hutmacher DW. the potential role of lycopene for the prevention and therapy of prostate cancer: from molecular mechanisms to clinical evidence. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013; 14(7): 14620-14646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140714620.
     Google Scholar
  17. Storniolo CE, Sacanella I, Mitjavila MT, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Moreno JJ. Bioactive compounds of cooked tomato sauce modulate oxidative stress and arachidonic acid cascade induced by oxidized LDL in macrophage cultures. Nutrients. 2019; 11(8): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081880.
     Google Scholar
  18. Osei MK, Bonsu KO, Agyeman A, Choi HS. Genetic diversity of tomato germplasm in ghana using morphological characters. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 2014; 3(3): 220-231.
     Google Scholar
  19. Vavilov NI. The Origin, Variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Soil Science. 1951; 72(6): 482.
     Google Scholar
  20. Robinson HF, Comstock RE, Harvey PH. Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in corn. Agronomy Journal. 1949; 41(8): 353.
     Google Scholar
  21. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal. 1955; 47(7): 314-318. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x.
     Google Scholar
  22. Jackson JE. A User’s Guide to Principal Components. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471725331.
     Google Scholar
  23. Islam M, Khan S. Variability and character association in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Bangladesh Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 1991; 23:13-18.
     Google Scholar
  24. McGiffen ME, Pantone DJ, Masiunas JB. Path Analysis of tomato yield components in relation to competition with black and eastern black nightshade. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 1994; 119(1): 6-11. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.119.1.6.
     Google Scholar
  25. Nagata M, Yamashita I. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi. 1992; 39(10): 925-928. https://doi.org/10.3136/nskkk1962.39.925.
     Google Scholar
  26. Baldwin EA, Georgelis N, Scot JW. Relationship of tomato fruit sugar concentration with physical & chemical traits & linkage of RAPD markers. Journal of American Society Horticultural Science. 2004; 129(6): 839-845.
     Google Scholar
  27. Johnson HW, Richardson M, Brar HA. Tomato genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants. Tomato Breeder’s Round Table. 1995; 65: 11-25.
     Google Scholar
  28. Hanson G, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Biometrical studies on yield in segregating population of Korean Lespedeza. Journal of Agronomy. 1956; 48: 268-274.
     Google Scholar
  29. Kumar AP, Reddy KR, Reddy RVSK, Pandravada SR, Saidaiah P. Heritability studies in dual purpose tomato genotypes for growth, yield and quality attributes. Plant Archives. 2016; 16(2): 885-889.
     Google Scholar
  30. Dar RA, Sharma JP. Genetic variability studies of yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2011; 5(2): 168-174.
     Google Scholar
  31. Akhter M, Apon FN, Bhuiyan MMR, Siddique AB, Husna A, Zeba N. Genetic variability, correlation coefficient, path coefficient and principal component analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. 2021; 22(25-26): 46-59.
     Google Scholar
  32. Kumar D, Kumar R, Kumar S, Bhardwaj M L, Thakur M C, Kumar R, et al. Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in tomato. International Journal of Vegetable Science. 2013; 19(4): 313-323. doi=10.1080/19315260.2012.726701.
     Google Scholar
  33. Dufera JT. Evaluation of agronomic performance and lycopene variation in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculantum Mill.) genotypes in Mizan, southwestern Ethiopia. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013; 27(11): 1450-1454.
     Google Scholar
  34. Sharmin S, Hannan A, Tahjib-ul-Arif M, Sagor GHM. Genetic association and path coefficient analysis among yield and nutritional traits of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2019; 17(2): 187-193. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v17i2.41942.
     Google Scholar
  35. Arun KP, Ravinder RK, Reddy RVSK, Pandravada SR, Saidaiah P. Heritability studies in dual purpose tomato genotypes for growth, yield and quality attributes. Plant Archives. 2016; 16(2): 885-889.
     Google Scholar
  36. Mitul R, Haque M, Rima S, Begum S. Field performance and genetic analysis of selected tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2016; 14: 31-36.
     Google Scholar
  37. Patel MS, Singh N, Kumar A, Singh MK, Yadav GC, Ghuge MB. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance of growth and yield components of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M.). Environment and Ecology. 2015; 33(3): 1034-1037.
     Google Scholar
  38. Mohamed SM, Ali EE, Mohamed TY. Study of heritability and genetic variability among different plant and fruit characters of tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.). International journal of scientific & technology research. 2012; 1(2): 55-58.
     Google Scholar
  39. Bhandari H, Srivastava K, Reddy G. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017; 6: 4131-4138. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.428.
     Google Scholar
  40. Reddy B. Correlation and Path analysis studies for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 2013; 4: 56-59.
     Google Scholar
  41. Winsor G, Davies J, Massey D. Composition of tomato fruit. IV.—Changes in some constituents of the fruit walls during ripening. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1962; 13: 141-145.
     Google Scholar
  42. Chaudhari GBF, Goravale R, Ramapura R, Bhat A, Hookunda L. Genetic plasticity for yield and yield related traits in minicore accessions of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). International Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2019; 7: 184-188.
     Google Scholar
  43. Shashikanth, Basavaraj N, Hosamani R M, Patil BC. Genetic variability in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon [Mill].Wettsd.). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2010; 23(3): 536-537.
     Google Scholar
  44. Kumari A, Grewal BB, Banerjee MK, Kumari A. Assessment of physico-chemical characteristics of different tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes. Vegetable Science. 1998; 25: 127-130.
     Google Scholar
  45. Ahmad R, Sharma J, Nabi A, Chopra S. Germplasm evaluation for yield and fruit quality traits in tomato (Solanum Lycopersicon L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2012; 7: 6143-6149. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR12.307.
     Google Scholar
  46. Kumar C, Singh D. A Correlation and path analysis studies of quantitative and qualitative traits in tomato. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018; 7(4): 2230-2238.
     Google Scholar
  47. Saini R, Sidhu AS, Singh D, Kumar A. Studies on genetic diversity in growth, yield and quality traits in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Journal of Horticultural Sciences. 2013; 8(1): 21–24.
     Google Scholar
  48. Tasisa J, Belew D, Bantte K. Genetic Associations Analysis among Some Traits of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Genotypes in West Showa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2012; 6: 129-139.
     Google Scholar
  49. Rima SA. Genetic potentiality of tomato genotypes and resistance screening for tomato yellow leaf curl disease linked to Ty 1 gene [M.S. Thesis]. Bangladesh: Bangladesh Agricultural University; 2016.
     Google Scholar
  50. Kaushik S, Tomar D, Dixit A. Genetics of fruit yield and it’s contributing characters in tomato (Solanum lycopersicom). Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development. 2011; 3(10): 209-213.
     Google Scholar
  51. Naher J. Marker Assisted selection and breeding of tomato for quality improvement [M.S. Thesis]. Bangladesh: Bangladesh Agricultural University, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  52. Shankar A, Reddy SRK, Sujatha M, Pratap M. Genetic association analysis for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2013; 10(2): 251-255.
     Google Scholar
  53. Khan M, Qureshi S. Path coefficient and correlation analysis studies on variation induced by gamma irradiation in M1 generation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Online J of Biol. Sci. 2001; 3: 108-110.
     Google Scholar
  54. Bhatt GM. Significance of path coefficient analysis in determining the nature of character association. Euphytica. 1973; 22: 338-343.
     Google Scholar
  55. Kumar C, Singh S. Estimation of combining ability analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for yield, nutritional and processing quality improvement. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2017; 9: 2021-2025.
     Google Scholar
  56. Rai AK, Vikram A, Gupta SK, Gupta M. Character association and path coefficient analysis for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under mid-hills of Himachal Pradesh. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2017; 8(3): 922-926.
     Google Scholar