##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

A market survey was conducted in Misungwi District to explore interventions towards increased milk processing. A total of 99 producers, 34 transporters and 11 traders of milk from six villages of the district were interviewed using questionnaires. It was found that at least 24,180.7 liters of milk are marketed from farmers every day in Misungwi. Majority (61.2 %) of the milk selling households sold milk to consumers and some others (35.8 %) sold to transporters whereas few (3 %) sold to traders. Prices per liter of milk fetched by producers, transporters and traders were 854, 1,680 and 2,122 TSHs, respectively. Accessibility to electricity, roads, extension, veterinary, inputs and water services was considered at least satisfactory by 95.9 %, 78.8 %, 83.9 %, 86.1 %, 49.5 % and 50.5 % of producers, respectively in the district. Supermarket and shops found in the district were selling packaged milk at a price of 3750 TSHs per liter. All milk transporters used bicycles and considerable part (44%) of them carried milk using un-recommended plastic containers. Milk quality testing is not commonly practiced in milk trading. The major chain bottleneck observed was thus identified to be underdevelopment of milk collection and lack of industrial scale dairy processor. The main intervention that was recommended is capitalizing on progressive farmers by organizing them to form dairy cooperatives. These can be capacitated to perform vibrantly functions of milk collection and processing and also to act as pivotal points for streamlining quality control through quality testing. The cooperative can be backed by existing service providers from both public and private sectors to combat the existing challenges. Major adaptation needed is coping with the dispersed and mobility nature of the milk producers which can be achieved by establishing an extensive but highly accessible milk bulking network.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). Milk and dairy products in human nutrition. Rome, Italy, 2013; 5–7. Visited March 12, 2022 from http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3396e/i3396e.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  2. Omore A, Cheng’ole M, Fakhrul I, Nurah G, Khan M, Staal S, Dugdill B. Employment Generation through Small-scale Dairy Marketing and processing: Experiences from Kenya, Bangladesh and Ghana, Joint Study. ILRI Market Oriented Smallholder Dairy Project and FAO Animal Production and Health Division. 2001.
     Google Scholar
  3. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR). Moving Herds, Moving Markets: Making markets work for African Pastoralists. 2013; International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Nairobi.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries (MALF), Budget Speech-Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries. 2017.
     Google Scholar
  5. Ministry of Livestock Development and Fisheries (MLDF), 2006. Livestock Policy, United Republic of Tanzania.
     Google Scholar
  6. Ministry of Livestock Development and Fisheries (MLDF), Tanzania Dairy Industry: Status, opportunities and prospects. 2011. Paper Presented to the 7th African Dairy Conference and Exhibition. Moven Pick Palm Hotel, Dar es Salaam, 25–27 May 2011.
     Google Scholar
  7. Ministry of Livestock Development and Fisheries, Budget Speech for the Financial Year 2020/21; 2020.
     Google Scholar
  8. Missungwi District Council (MDC), 2017. District Profile.
     Google Scholar
  9. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Tanzania Population and Housing Data Sheet, United Republic of Tanzania. 2012.
     Google Scholar
  10. Chasama G, Tungu G, Socio-economic Values and Performance of Zebu Cattle Indigenous in Ukerewe and Bunda Districts of Tanzania: Huria Journal, 2017; 24 (3):111-125.
     Google Scholar
  11. Ebing P, Rutgers K. Preparation of dairy products. AGROMISA/CTA. 2003; (36).
     Google Scholar
  12. Ndambi A, Hemme T, Latacz-Lohmann U. Dairying in Africa - Status and recent developments. 2007. Lrrd. 19(111). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/8/ndam19111.htm.
     Google Scholar
  13. Kurwijila RL, Mboya N, Laizer M, Omore A. The Efficacy of the Mazzican for milking, transportation and improving bacteriological quality of milk in the smallholder dairy value chain in Tanzania. Paper presented at the Seventh All Africa conference on Animal Agriculture, Accra, Ghana, 29 July-2 August 2019. 2019.
     Google Scholar
  14. Massawe H., Mdegela H. and Kurwijila R. Association of management and milking practices on microbiological quality of milk in Mbeya, Tanzania. Bull. of Anim. Health. Prod. Afr, 2018; 66(1): 51-65.
     Google Scholar
  15. Worku T, Negera E, Nurfeta A, Welearegay H. Microbiological Quality and Safety of Raw milk collected from Borana pastoral community, Oromia regional State. AJFST 2012; 3(9): 213-222.
     Google Scholar