##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Digital finance is widely regarded as one of the most effective means of financially empowering women and increasing their financial inclusion. On the other hand, cybercriminals are constantly looking for new ways to exploit vulnerabilities and developing ever more sophisticated attack methods. As a result, the cyber risk exposures and prevention of female heads of farm households in Southern Nigeria were investigated in this paper. Unsuccessful transactions by mobile applications and POINT OF SALES (POS) terminals were often encountered by female heads, and yet their money was debited, and it took a long time for their money that was debited from unsuccessful transactions to be reversed. Avoiding lonely ATMs and not going to the ATM during late hours, ignoring emails and text messages instructing them to provide online banking details, no longer using birthdates, addresses, and other words or numbers that would make it easier for attackers to figure out their passwords, and not using the same passwords for all their different accounts were the most common cybersecurity measures used by female heads. Access to digital financial products and services was influenced by factors such as marital status, household size, business experience, internet access, possession of an ICT device, and perceived security risks. These findings call for interventions by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) through policies that will improve consumer education and reduce vulnerabilities, especially among women. The CBN should also develop a forum that is easily accessible to customers for filing complaints, and erring banks should be sanctioned.

References

  1. World Bank. ICT enabling rural financial services and micro-insurance for smallholders [Internet]. e.forum. 2013 [cited 2016 Oct 2]. Available from: http://www.ictinagriculture.org/sourcebook.
     Google Scholar
  2. Enhancing Financial Innovation and Access (EFInA). Access to Financial Services in Nigeria 2018 Survey. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 2]. Available from: www.efina.org.
     Google Scholar
  3. Suman J. ICTs And Women’s Empowerment: Some Case Studies from India [Internet]. LakshmiBai College, Delhi University; Available from: unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/.
     Google Scholar
  4. Fuwa N. “The Poverty and Heterogeneity among Female Household Heads Revisited:The Case of Panama .” World Dev. 2000;28(8):1515–42.
     Google Scholar
  5. Ramaprasad R. Female-Headed Households and Poverty: Evidence from the National Family Health Survey. Terry College of Business, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA.; 2009.
     Google Scholar
  6. Barros, R., Fox, L., &Mendonca R. “Female-Headed Households, Poverty, and the Welfare of Children in Urban Brazil.” Econ Dev Cult Change. 1997;45(2):231–57.
     Google Scholar
  7. Gunjun Y. Risk types and risk amplification of online finance. Inf Technol J. 2013;12(3):494–7.
     Google Scholar
  8. Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council. Purchasers’ Guide to Cyber Insurance Products [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Jun 10]. Available from: www.fsscc.org.
     Google Scholar
  9. Virender SS. Risks in E-Banking and Their Management. Int J Mark Financ Serv Manag Res. 2012;1(9):164.
     Google Scholar
  10. Sääksjärvi, M., & Lampinen M. Consumer perceived risk in successive product generations. Eur J Innov Manag. 2005;8(2):145–56.
     Google Scholar
  11. Nadine, H., Klaus-Peter, W., Barbara, S., Lars, P & Martin K. The influence of consumers’ risk attitudes and behavior on the adoption of online banking services. J Mark Trends. 2010;1(1):7–16.
     Google Scholar
  12. Slovic P. Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality. In: National Cancer Institute workshop on Conceptualizing and Measuring Risk Perceptions. Wasshington D.C; 2003.
     Google Scholar
  13. National Population Commission. Nigeria 2006 Population Census Arranged by State. Abuja, Nigeria; 2006.
     Google Scholar
  14. Enhancing Financial Innovation and Access (EFInA). Access to Financial Services in Nigeria 2014 Survey [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Jun 4]. Available from: www.efina.org.
     Google Scholar
  15. Enhancing Financial Innovation and Access (EFInA). Access to Financial Services in Nigeria 2016 Survey [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Jun 16]. Available from: www.efina.org.
     Google Scholar
  16. Omodunbi B.A, Odiase P.O OO. & EA. Cybercrimes in Nigeria: Analysis, Detection and Prevention, Journal of Engineering and Technology. J Eng Technol. 2016;1(1):27–42.
     Google Scholar
  17. National Cybersecurity Center (NCC). Common Cyber attacks: Reducing the Impact. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Jan 18]. Available from: www.cyber-center.org.
     Google Scholar
  18. Vijay M. Determinants of Internet Banking Adoption: An Empirical Evidences from Indian Banking. Indian J Commer Manag Stud. 2011;2(1):4–25.
     Google Scholar
  19. Fadare O. A Survey on Perceived Risk and Intention of Adopting Internet Banking. J Internet Bank Commer. 2016;21(1):1–21.
     Google Scholar