##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Transhumant farming system is one of the earliest agricultural activities in Greece having an important role in the conservation of biodiversity, the preservation of rural tradition and cohesion of the rural population. The objective of this study was to construct a transhumant farm typology that could be used as a tool by the decision makers or farmers to improve the management of the farms. The required information was obtained from totally 551 Greek transhumant producers. A Principal Component Analysis gave five components related to the production cost of the farms, the intensity of management, the evolution of the extensive character of the system, the type of herds and the future of the system. Using multivariate techniques, a farm typology was established with four categories. The three categories, were characterized by lower production cost and intensification rate while preserved generally a more extensive character. Among them the first group defined as “evolution of the farming system” bred mainly sheep and producers were significantly more adaptive to some kind of innovations, the second group was constituted mainly by large goat herds while the third one by small sheep herds’. The fourth group, defined as the “intensive one” meaning high production cost, intensification rate and working hours per female as well as limitation of time spent grazing. Besides the definition of the character of the transhumance nowadays the results interestingly, highlighted the future of transhumant farms that tends to be doubtful for a number of farmers originated mainly by the last group.

References

  1. M. Ruiz and J.P Ruiz, “Ecological history of transhumance in Spain.” Biological Conservation, Vol 37, pp 73-86, 1986, https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(86)90035-2.
     Google Scholar
  2. A. Koocheri, and S.R. Gliessman, Pastoral nomadism, a sustainable system for grazing land management in Arid Areas. J. Sustain. Agric., vol 25, pp113-131, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v25n04_09
     Google Scholar
  3. A.Siasiou, K. Galanopoulos, I. Mitsopoulos, A. Ragkos, and V. Lagka, Transhumant sheep and goat farming sector in Greece. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 2018, http://ijas.iaurasht.ac.ir/article_544723.html.
     Google Scholar
  4. I. Mitsopoulos, A. Siasiou, D. Chatziplis, S. Kiritsi, V. Michas, V. Lagka and K. Galanopoulos, “Transhumant sheep and goat farming sector in Sterea Ellada–Greece” Animal Science and Biotechnologies,48:157-160, 2015, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy.
     Google Scholar
  5. R. Baumont, S. Prache, M. Meuret, and P. Morand-Fehr, “How forage characteristics influence behavior and intake in small ruminants: a review”. Livestock Production Science64: 15–28, 2000, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00172-X.
     Google Scholar
  6. G. Zervas, Quantifying an optimizing grazing regimes in Greek mountain systems. Journal of Applied Ecology,35:983-986, 1998, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228019980.
     Google Scholar
  7. C. Köbrich, T. Rehman, M. Khan, “Typification of farming systems for constructing representative farm models: two illustrations of the application of multivariate analyses in Chile and Pakistan” Agr Syst 76, 141-157, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00013-6.
     Google Scholar
  8. F.P, Morand, Recent developments in goat nutrition and application: A review. Small ruminant research, 60: 25-43, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.004.
     Google Scholar
  9. Y. Mena, J.M. Castel, R. Jimenez and F.A Ruiz, “Sustainability analysis of small ruminant farms involved in the conservation of natural resources”. Options Mediterraneenees. 100, 119-124, 2001, http://om.cih eam.org/article.ph p?ID PD F=801 49 2.
     Google Scholar
  10. R. Caballero, “Typology of cereal sheep farming systems in Castile La Mancha South Central Spain.” Agri. Syst. 68, 215-232. 2001, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00009-9.
     Google Scholar
  11. I. Hadjigeorgiou, “Past, present and future of pastoralism in Greece”. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice,1:24, 2011, https://pastoralismjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2041-7136-124.
     Google Scholar
  12. K. Liechti and J.P Biber, “Pastoralism in Europe: characteristics and challenges of highland- lowland transhumance.”, Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizzotics)”35 (2): 561-575,2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.35.2.2541
     Google Scholar
  13. J.D. Wood, R.I. Richardson, G.R. Nute, A.V. Fisher, M.M. Campoo, E. Kasapidou, P.R Sheard and M. Enser, “Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: A review”, Meat science 66 (1): 21-32, 2004, DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00022-6.
     Google Scholar
  14. J. Frelich, M. Slachta, O. Hanus, J. Spinka and E. Samkova, “Fatty acid composition of cow milk fat produced on low-input mountain farms”, Czech Journal of Animal Science 54 (12), 531-539, 2009, DOI: 10.17221/226/2009-CJAS.
     Google Scholar
  15. E. Metera and T. Sakowski, “Grazing as a tool to maintain biodiversity of grasslands”. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 28, 315-334, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  16. A. Pardini and M. Nori, “Afro-silvo-pastoral systems in Italy: integration and diversification”, Pastoralism: Res. Pol. Pract. 1, 1-26, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-7136-1-26.
     Google Scholar
  17. S. Landaua, A. Perevolotsky, D. Bonfilb, D. Barkai and S. Silanikove, “Utilization of low-quality resources by small ruminants in Mediterranean agro-pastoral systems: the case of browse and aftermath cereal stubble”. Livestock Production Science 64: 39–49, 2000, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03016226000, 174.
     Google Scholar
  18. W. Madry, Y Mena, B. Roszkowska-Madra, D. Gozdowski, R. Hryniewski. and J.M. Castel, “An overview of farming system typology methodologies and its use in the study of pasture-based farming system: a review". Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 11(2), 316-326, 2013, 10.5424/sjar/2013112-3295.
     Google Scholar
  19. K. Tindano, N. Moula, A. Traoré, P. Leroy and N. Antoine- Moussiaux, “Characteristics and typology of sheep herding systems in the suburban area of Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)”, Arch. Anim. Breed, 58, 415–423, 2015, DOI: 10.5194/aab-58-415-2015.
     Google Scholar
  20. R.F. Guilherme, A.M.C. Lima, D.F. Costa, R.R Pinheiro, F.S.F. Alves, S.S Azevedo, C.J. Alves, “Characterization and typology of sheep and goat production systems in the State of Paraíba, a semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil”. SEMINA: CIENCIAS AGRARIAS vol 38 (4), pp. 21-63, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p2163.
     Google Scholar
  21. A.I. Gelasakis, G.E. Valergakis, G. Arsenos and G. Banos, “Description and typology of intensive Chios dairy sheep farms in Greece” J Dairy Sci 95, 3070-3079, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4975.
     Google Scholar
  22. G. Murphy and D. Meredith, A typology of cattle farmers in Ireland: An overview of data, method and indicators. International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy.
     Google Scholar
  23. J.L. Riedel, I. Casasus, A. Bernués, “Sheep farming intensification and utilization of natural recourses in a Mediterranean pastoral agro-ecosystem”, Livestock Science,111:153-163, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.12.013.
     Google Scholar
  24. G. Beaufoy, C. Keenleyside and R. Oppermann “How should the EU and national policies support HNV farming? In High Nature Value farming in Europe”, (R. Oppermann, G. Beaufoy & G. Jones, eds). Verlag Regionalkultur, Basel, 525–535, 2012, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313649423_How_should_EU_and_national_policies_support_HNV_farming.
     Google Scholar