Effect of Canola and Compound Fertilizer on Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Bacterial Wilt Management



Abstract Views
1035

Downloads
568

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Oct 5, 2020
Published Jan 14, 2021
10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.1.130

Abstract viewed = 1035 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Bacterial wilt is a problematic disease affecting potato production in Kenya and the available management methods are not efficient. Field, semi-field and laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of canola green manure and compound fertilizer on bacterial wilt management. Laboratory experiment was conducted at Egerton university biological laboratory to evaluate the effect of canola extract on R. solanacearum population density in-vitro. Four levels of canola extract quantities were used; 0, 100, 200, 300microlitres, and enrich immunomodulator (Di-bromo Di-nitro propane 1-3-diol) (DDD) was used as a positive control. Inoculum was prepared from infested soil and Selective Medium South Africa (SMSA) (Casamino acids, Bacto-Peptone, Glycerol, and Bacto-Agar) was used as growth medium in a completely randomized design. Field experiment was carried out in two sites (Elburgon site is in Upper high land zone two (UH2) and Mau-Narok is in Upper high land zone one UH1). Two levels of canola green manure (with and without green manure application), four levels of fertilizer (NPK+Ca+Mg+ micronutrients) applied at 0(F1), 250(F2), 575(F3), 900 (F4) kg ha-1 and diammonium phosphate (DAP500 kg ha-1) +Calcium ammonium nitrate             (CAN300 kg ha-1) (F5) as a positive control. The experiment was carried out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) spilt plot replicated three times, canola green manure as main plot and fertilizer and varieties combination as sub plots. Semi-field experiment (in pots) was conducted at Egerton university farm, five levels of canola green manure (100, 75, 50 and 0 g kg-1 soil) and four levels of the compound fertilizer as used in the field experiment were used in a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replicates. The data shows that canola extract did not have a significant (Pr <0.05) effect on bacterial population density (CFU), where chemical treatment (DDD) restricted the growth of R. solanacearum under laboratory experiment. Under field and semi-filed experiments, canola green manure and fertilizer treatments had no significant (Pr <0.05) effect on bacterial population density in the soil nor bacterial wilt incidence. Kenya karibu variety it did not show any wilting symptoms of bacterial wilt across the sites and semi-field experiment. Canola did not suppress the growth of R. solanacearum; further investigation should be done on other brassica family plants.

Keywords: Green manure, Canola extract, Biofumigation, compound fertilizers, Bacterial wilt, enrich immunomodulator

References

  1. CGIAR, Case studies: Kenya and Uganda. pp 24-27: In Herron, A. (ed.). A Biotechnology in Africa. Mermaid House, London Profile Business Intelligence Ltd, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  2. J. Muthoni, H. Shimelis, R. Melis and Z.M Kinua, Response of Potato Genotypes to Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia Solanacearum (Smith) (Yabuuchi et al.) In the Tropical Highlands. American. Journal of Potato Research.91,215–232, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  3. J. Muthoni, J., Shimelis, H and R. Melis, Management of Bacterial Wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum ) of Potatoes: Opportunity for Host Resistance in Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(9): 64-78, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  4. M.T Monther and S. Kamaruzaman S,Ralstonia solanacearum: The Bacterial Wilt Causal Agent. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 9: 385-393, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  5. G.P. Champoiseau P G. (2008a). Black rot; USDA-NRI Project: R. solanacearum race 3 biovar 2: detection, exclusion and analysis of a Select Agent Educational modules, Available online: https://plantpath.ifas.ufl.edu /rsol/Ralstonia.pdf., 2008a.
     Google Scholar
  6. National Potato council of Kenya, Potato variety catalogue, Available online: https://npck.org/catalogue/, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  7. X. Hao, L.D. Rosa and P.M. Alberto, Insights into the Root Invasion by the Plant Pathogenic Bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum. Plants, 9(4), 516, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  8. E.I.M. Stander, P.S. Hammes and E.A. Beyers, Survival of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2 in soil under different cropping systems, South African Journal of Plant andSoil, 20:4, 176-179, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  9. T. Arwiyanto, H. Semangun and B.N Hidayah, Reduction of ralstonia solanacearum population in soil with the use of susceptible cultivar of tomato. Acta Horticulture. 914, 303-306, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  10. Agriculture Victoria, Potatoes – Bacterial Wilt. Available: online; http://agriculture.vic.gov.au/agriculture/pests-diseases-andweeds/plant-diseases/vegetable/potato-diseases/potatoes-bacterial-wilt, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  11. Yuliar, Y.A. Nion and K. Toyota, Recent Trends in Control Methods for Bacterial Wilt Diseases Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbes and Environments, 30(1), 1–11, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  12. M.T. Vinh, T.T.Tung and H.X. Quang, Primary bacterial wilt study on tomato in vegetable areas of Ho Chi Minch city, Vietnam. In: Allen C, Prior P, Hayward A, editors. Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex. American Phytopathological Society Press; St Paul, MN: 2005. pp. 177–184, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  13. Z. Karim and M. Hossain, Management of bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) of potato: focus on natural bioactive compounds. Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresource Management, 4(1), 73–92, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  14. CABI,Ralstonia solanacearum (bacterial wilt of potato). Available online: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/45009, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  15. R. Kakuhenzire, B. Lemaga, I. Kashaija, O. Ortiz and B. Mateeka, Effect of Crotalaria falcata in Crop Rotation and Fallowing on Potato Bacterial Wilt Incidence, Disease Severity and Latent Infection in Tubers and Field Soil. Biopesticides International. 9. 182-194. 2013.
     Google Scholar
  16. R.P Larkin and T.S. Griffin,Control of soilborne potato diseases using Brassica green manures. Crop Protection, 26(7), 1067–1077, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  17. A. Rick, Boydston, and Ann Hang, Rapeseed (Brassica napus) Green Manure Crop Suppresses Weeds in Potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technology,9(4), 669-675, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  18. J.A. Kirkegard andM. Sarwar.(1998).Biofumigation potential of brassicas. I. Variation in glucosinolate profiles of diverse field-grown brassicas. Plant and Soil ;201:71–89, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  19. R.P. Larkin, Green manures and plant disease management.CAB Reviews 8(037):1-10, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  20. B.G. Fulya, L. Prabha and M.A. Karla, Effect of Brassica crop-based biofumigation on soilborne disease suppression in woody ornamentals, Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology,42:1,94-106, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  21. A. Sintayehu, A. Seid, F. Chemed and P.K. Sakhuja, Evaluation of Green Manure Amendments for the Management of Fusarium Basal Rot (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cepae) on Shallot. International Journal of Agronomy, 2014:1-6, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  22. N. Motisi, F. Montfort, T. Doré, N. Romillac and P. Lucas,Duration of control of two soilborne pathogens following incorporation of above- and below-ground residues of Brassica junceainto soil. Plant Pathology, 58(3), 470–478, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  23. A.O. Abigael, O.O. Julius, O.W. Javan and R. Nicholas, Response of spring and winter barley to pyrenophorateres under high and medium altitude zones of Kenya. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Food Sciences, 2(2): 1-10, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  24. R. Jaetzold, H. Schimdt, B. Hornetz and C. Shisnaya, Farm management handbook of Kenya. Natural conditions and farm management information. Volume II B. Nairobi Kenya. pp 379-413, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  25. R.N. Onwonga, J.J. Lelei, J.K. Friedel and B. Freyer, Soil Nutrient Status and Maize (Zea Mays L.) Performance under Contrasting Legume-Maize Cropping Systems and Soils in Central Rift Valley, Kenya. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 3 (2), 241-263, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  26. Kenya Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Climate Risk Profile for Nakuru. Kenya County Climate Risk Profile Series. The Kenya Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MoALF), Nairobi, Kenya, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  27. Z.M. Kinyua, S.A. Miller, C. Ashlina and S. Nagendra, Bacterial wilt disease. Bacterial wilt standard operating procedure for use in Diagnostic laboratories. Available online: https://ipmil.cired.vt.edu/wp-content/uploads/Ralstonia-solanacerum-East Africa Final.pdf, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  28. P.G. Champoiseau, R. solanacearum / Culture Media. Available online: https://plantpath.ifas.ufl.edu/rsol/ Culturemedia.html, 2008b.
     Google Scholar
  29. Agriculture, Forestry and fisheries, Production guideline for canola. Available https://www.daff.gov.za/Canola Production Guideline.pdf, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  30. A.M. McGuire, Green Manures, Washington State University Extension. http://pubs.cahnrs.wsu.edu/publications/wpcontent/uploads.pdf, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  31. T. Adrien, Effect of timing and methods of mineral fertilizer application on Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) performance in Musanze and Nyaruguru Districts, Rwanda. Master thesis. University of Nairobi, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  32. National Potato council of Kenya, guide to potato production and postharvest management in Kenya, Available online: https:// npck.org books potato production manual.pdf, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  33. M. Nyongesa, C. Lung’aho, P. Kinyae, M. Wakahiu, J. Karinga and J. Kabira, Production of food (ware) potato. KARI information brochure series / 35 /2008.
     Google Scholar
  34. G.B. Yadessa, A.H.C. van Bruggen and F.L. Echo, Effects of different soil amendments on bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum and on the yield of tomato. Journal of Plant Pathology, 92(2): 439-450, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  35. K.A. Gomez and A.A Gomez, Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2 ed.). John wiley and sons, NewYork, International rice research institute, Pp: 84-462, 1983.
     Google Scholar
  36. A.M. Lacasta, I.R. Cantalapiedra, C.E. Auguet, A. Peñaranda, A and L. Ramírez-Piscina, Modeling of spatiotemporal patterns in bacterial colonies. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, 59(6), 7036–7041, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  37. R. Larkin and R. LynchUse and Effects of Different Brassica and Other Rotation Crops on Soilborne Diseases and Yield of Potato. Horticulture, 4(4), 37, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  38. E.S. Oplinger, L.L. Hardman, E.T. Gritton, J.D. Doll and K.A. Kelling, Canola (Rapeseed). Alternative field manual. Available: https://hort.purdue.edu/newcrop /afcm/canola.html, 1989.
     Google Scholar
  39. J. Chen, Y. Yu, S. Li and W. Ding, Resveratrol and Coumarin: Novel Agricultural Antibacterial Agent against Ralstonia solanacearum In Vitro and In Vivo. Molecules, 21(11), 1-18, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  40. S. Li, Y. Yu, J. Chen, B. Guo, L. Yang and W. Ding, Evaluation of the Antibacterial Effects and Mechanism of Action of Protocatechualdehyde against Ralstonia solanacearum. Molecules, 21(6), 1-13, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  41. P. Jayesh, M.S. Joshi, N. Sudhir and R.C. Agale, Physiological and Biochemical Characters of Ralstonia solanacearum. International Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences. 1, (6), 2348-3997, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  42. P. Deberdt, B. Perrin, R. Coranson-Beaudu, P.F. Duyck and E. Wicker, Effect of Allium fistulosum extract on Ralstonia solanacearum populations and tomato bacterial wilt. Plant Disease. 96:687-692, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  43. Kumar, V.B. Kiran, Sanath and N. Mallikarjuna, Effect of botanicals on Ralstonia solanacearum and bacterial wilt incidence in tomato. International Journal of Chemical Studies; 5(6): 737-740, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  44. T.M.C.F. Van, M.A. de Pedro and F. Cava, Determinants of Bacterial Morphology: From Fundamentals to Possibilities for Antimicrobial Targeting. Frontier Microbiology. 8:1264.2017.
     Google Scholar
  45. X. Zheng, B. Liu, Y. Zhu, J. Wang, H. Zhang and Z. Wang, Bacterial community diversity associated with the severity of bacterial wilt disease in tomato fields in south-east China. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 65(7): 538-549, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  46. G. Shen, S. Zhang and X. Liu, Soil acidification amendments change the rhizosphere bacterial community of tobacco in a bacterial wilt affected field. Applied Microbiological Biotechnology. 102, 9781–9791, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  47. N.A.S. Messiha, van Bruggen, A.H.C. van and A.D. Diepeningen, Potato brown rot incidence and severity under different management and amendment regimes in different soil types. European Journal Plant Pathology. 119, 367–381, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  48. S.M.C. Njoroge, M.B.C. Riley and A.P Keinath. Effect of incorporation of Brassica spp. residues on population densities of soilborne microorganisms and on damping-off and Fusarium wilt of watermelon. Plant Diseases. 92:287-294, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  49. Canola Council of Canada, What is Canola? Available: http://www.canolacouncil .org/oil- and-meal/what-is-canola, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  50. H. Kanaan, S. Medina, A. Krassnovsky and M. Raviv, Survival of Macrophomina phaseolina s.l. and Verticillium dahliae during solarization as affected by composts of various maturities. Crop Protection, 76, 108-113, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  51. S. Dinesh, D.K. Yadav, S. Shweta and c. Garima, Effect of temperature, cultivars, injury of root and inoculums load of Ralstonia solanacearum to cause bacterial wilt of tomato, Archives of Phytopathology and Plant protection, 47:13, 1574-1583, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  52. T. Jirasak and K. Jirasak, Increased Tomato Yields by Heat Treatment for Controlling Ralstonia solanacearum in Soil. Kasetsart Journal (Natural Science) 41: 219 - 224 ,2007.
     Google Scholar
  53. Patrício, A. Flávia, S. Irene, C. Amaury, N. Osvaldo. S. João. B. Celso, N. Luís and Júlio, Soil solarization evaluation for the control of Ralstonia solanacearum. Fitopatologia Brasileira. 30(5) 475-481, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  54. R. Felix, O.J. Onyango and O.M. Eliazer, Assessment of Irish Potato Cultivars’ Field Tolerance to Bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) in Kenya. Plant Pathology Journal, 9: 122-128, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  55. G.L. Hartman and J.G. Elphinstone, Advances in the Control of Pseudomonas solanacearum Race 1 in Major Food Crops. In: Bacterial Wilt: The Disease and its Causative Agent, Pseudomonas solanacearum, Hartman, G.L. and J.G. Elphinstone (Eds.). CAB International, Wallingford, pp: 157-178, 1994.
     Google Scholar
  56. Patil, G. Virupaksh, S. Jai and Bibhu, Improvement for Bacterial Wilt Resistance in Potato By Conventional and Biotechnological Approaches. Agricultural Research. 1, 299–316, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  57. S. Priou, P. Aley, E. Chujoy, B. Lemaga and E.R. French, Integrated control of bacterial wilt of potato, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  58. E.R. French, Integrated Control of Bacterial Wilt of Potato. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru, 1996.
     Google Scholar